BY ROLE
Engineering leaders Stop shipping the same bug class.
Product security and code review
Scanners rank findings; they do not model business logic or authorisation. We read the code paths that carry money, identity and data, hand back the fix and the CI check, then teach the pattern to the people who wrote it.
What the engagement looks like. Fixed in writing before it starts.
four steps, in the order they happen · scope and dates are fixed in writing before anything is touched
Review what tooling misses
Business-logic and authorisation flaws are the classes that survive a SAST pipeline, so they are the classes a human reads for.
Hand back the fix
Every finding arrives with the change that closes it, in your language and framework, not just a severity.
Put a gate in CI
The patterns we found become checks in your pipeline, so the same class does not reach main again.
Workshop, then retest
A workshop rebuilds the findings as labs for your own engineers, and the retest within 14 days confirms the pattern is gone.
What you get. Files, sessions and letters.
Deliverables, not promises. Every one of them is a file, a session or a letter you can hand to somebody else.
- Findings with fixes in your language and framework
- A CI gate design for the patterns we found
- A developer workshop built from your own code
- One retest within 14 days, included
NEXT STEP
Talk directly to an operator. Scope and cost come back in writing.
Tell us what you are trying to prove and to whom. You get a written scope, timeline and fee within 2 working days - and an honest answer if the work you asked for is not the work you need.