BY OUTCOME
Ship safer code Fix the bug class, not the ticket.
Secure code analysis before release
We review the code paths that carry money, identity and data, then turn the findings into labs your own engineers work through. The fix is a pattern change, not a ticket - and the retest proves it held.
What the engagement looks like. Fixed in writing before it starts.
four steps, in the order they happen · scope and dates are fixed in writing before anything is touched
Pick the paths that matter
Review starts at the code that carries money, identity and data, not at whatever the scanner ranked highest.
Read what tooling cannot model
Business-logic and authorisation flaws are the classes that survive a SAST pipeline, so they are the classes a human reads for.
Design the gate
Findings come with the fix and with the CI check that stops the same pattern reaching main again.
Teach it, then retest
A workshop rebuilds the findings as labs your engineers work through, and the retest within 14 days confirms the pattern is gone.
What you get. Files, sessions and letters.
Deliverables, not promises. Every one of them is a file, a session or a letter you can hand to somebody else.
- Findings with fixes, not just severities
- A CI gate design for the patterns we found
- A developer workshop built from your own code
- One retest within 14 days, included
NEXT STEP
Talk directly to an operator. Scope and cost come back in writing.
Tell us what you are trying to prove and to whom. You get a written scope, timeline and fee within 2 working days - and an honest answer if the work you asked for is not the work you need.